

Tech Talk: CO2 – Carbon Dioxide, All it's Gassed
Up To Be
In this age
of concern over the care and feeding of hazardous pool materials,
a needed replacement for muriatic acid seems to have been found.
If you're using a high-pH sanitizer in your pool (bleach, cal hypo
or lithium hypo being the most common) chances are you've been using
an offsetting acid – hoping each day you don't splash it on
you clothes, squirt it in your eye, siphon it into the pool or spill
enough to wreck the pump room. Maybe you should be using carbon
dioxide... At first glance, its the answer to all those concerns
and more. But is it, really?
This harmless,
abundant gas is now being used very effectively as an acid substitute
by a small-but-growing group of public-pool owners. Carbon dioxide
(CO2), bubbled into the return line, produces carbonic
acid which can offset those high-pH sanitizers, forever to take
the place of troublesome, dangerous acids. Here's the list of the
bubbly's advertised advantages: 1. CO2's completely
safe; you can breath the stuff. 2. It's available everywhere and
no more expensive than other methods of downside pH control. 3.
It's easy to feed and to automate. 4. CO2 results in
a pH no lower than 6.8, so even major feed errors can't drive the
pH down to damaging levels. 5. It can replace acid in almost any
pool.
Trouble is,
none of these five advantages is really, completely true!
Let's look at
the claims one at a time, discussing the true advantages and the
honest weaknesses. Then we'll highlight some solid advances in this
technology, finally allowing pool owners to consider anew the real
possibilities for using CO2!
1) As you take
this gas in with every breath (CO2 is about 3% of our
atmosphere) and exhale even more of it, it's obviously pretty safe.
The main concern of designers and users is ventilation of equipment
compartments and chemical rooms; a massive leak of this heavier-than-air,
odorless gas might displace all the air in an enclosed area. An
unsuspecting operator could faint – even die – from
lack of oxygen, without so much as a cough.
2) Yep, it's
available everywhere, as CO2 is the carbonation in
every fizzy drink or soda pop you've ever gulped down. And the route
truck that just serviced the local fast-food restaurant can stop
at your pool site next. But it won't match inexpensive, reliable
acid. Carbon dioxide hasn't proven to be nearly as cheap as the
eager salesman claimed or the hopeful purchasing agent dreamed,
since so many variables can effect the consumption rate –
and they usually do. This bleak picture is changing now, so read
on.
3) CO2 is fed through a simple regulator/rotometer, a little like gas chlorine.
It's not corrosive, carries no solids to clog things up, and automated
controllers can switch the feed on with the simple click of a solenoid.
Lots of gas can be stored at your site. bulk delivery into 500-pound
low pressure systems is common, where CO2 fills a big,
stainless-steel "Thermos jug" called a cryogenic tank.
(Small, 50-pound high-pressure steel bottles can be delivered and
used for smaller pools, too.) The real feed difficulty lies in the
"injection" – where all the problems arise and the
costs go up. The commonly used fish-tank-like diffuser stone mounted
in the flowing stream just can't get the right amount of gas dissolved,
and the mixed results are virtually always counterproductive.
4) Almost all
of us believed that carbonic acid had a pH around 6.8, as we spread
this false assumption through text and classroom. Credentialed chemists
and a few talented pool researchers knew better, and are recently
taking full advantage of the fact that injected circulation water
can be much lower in pH. The reason CO2 has such a
difficult time getting water to lower pH values is the same reason
it costs so much to use, and the "no damaging pH" conversation
is simply a smoke screen for poor feeder technology! We'd better
look at some simplified chemistry and a little history, then see
how it's been resolved...
First, we suppose
you know about CO2 and water making carbonic acid and,
ironically, bicarbonates too. The first resultant has an down-side
pH influence, while the other can have an influence up while increasing
TA to boot. Maximizing the "down" and minimizing the "up"
results in the desired offset for high-pH sanitizers with little
bicarbonate effect; but feed the gas in a sloppy, gross fashion
(large bubbles, less water) and get the costly opposite –
lots of home-made bicarbonate of soda! What needs to occur here
is excellent dissolving of the CO2 into the pool water.
That's just not been happening. Folks were trying to do it right,
but the fish-stone bubblers were simply not effective enough.
For years, responsible
designers and equipment suppliers performed a total alkalinity test
on local water before choosing CO2 as the choice for
pH management. If the TA was high, say, above 120 to 130 ppm, the
owner'd better go with acid. Low TA make-up water, on the other
hand, made him or her a solid candidate for this new miracle application
so in went the CO2 container, regulator and injector.
Many were happy, but about as many were not. The TA tended to rise
steadily in about half of these pre-qualified pools. Then consumption
began to rise, and rise some more. Many pools experienced TAs of
200 ppm or higher, and a few actually reached the lofty levels around
800 ppm!! "Hold a lower pH in the pool", the owner was
told, then "get your calcium hardness up above three times
your TA value". "Feed at slower rates, not faster, so
the pH effect is greater." (But slow feed doesn't keep up with
demand, much less catch up, on busy days – so pH automation
becomes valueless.) "Split your CO2 injections
to two locations, then the each will feed slower and give you more
pH effect, less bicarb effect." All this advice was appropriate,
and it often worked. But there had to be a better way...
About this time
we're seeing a surge in ozone-system development and sales. Ozone's
tougher to dissolve than CO2, so boost pumps and venturi
injectors have become the norm. Why not try these highly refined
injectors with CO2? A major Florida equipment distributor,
frustrated with the old way, did just that. Pressure gauges, flow
meters, even a pH probe and meter were installed, and what do you
know... pH values in the low 5s were developed in the side stream
water! The instant result? Better and quicker pH management, less
CO2 consumption, and the total alkalinity actually
went down. (Remember, when water's pH gets below about 5.5, all
alkaline components turn into more CO2 and water, and
the TA of the effected water becomes essentially zero!) With a little
balancing of gas feed and side-stream flows, with the sanitizer's
and make-up water's collective influence, we finally can get what
we're after. Safe pH control we can afford.
So what about
promise 5. ? Maybe the salesman was right after all. Carbon dioxide
can replace acid in most any pool after all!
© 2002
Professional Pool Operators of America |